2015-08-11 13:18 GMT+02:00 zdzislaw <[email protected]>: > > 2015-08-11 11:28 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at gmail.com > >: > > Then it seems that the quality level has not the same meaning on > > every wikisources. Typo such as « rn » intead of « m » are usually > > removed on the red or yellow step on fr.ws (and such obvious error > > can be seen before editing, reviewing the final render code seems enough > to me). > on pl ws it should be done on "without text" -> red step >
Ok, we totally agree. > > for me all typo should be gone at the previous stage (and > > personally, I don't go from red to yellow if there is still such typo > mistakes). > should be... but statistically on red-> yellow step I find 2-4 typos, on > yellow-> green step - 1-2 typos (on fr ws too); if on yellow-> green step I > could not found any typos, I do not change its status immediately, leave it > on another day to be sure. > Again we agree. > I'll write it again ... that is not safe to validate a page without > reviewing its wikicode. Are I'm puzzled: why? A BGB at the end of the PREVIEW(!) content in Page namespace WITHOUT > displaying and reviewing wikitext content (raw code) it's a bad proposal, > declining the quality of proofreading process results, and... I do not > think so that "it's unrealistic to expect the raw code to be review for all > page" > Strange... Are you against VisualEditor too? And what can you see on the raw code that you can't see on the rendered code? (obviously not typo and <center> vs. <div align="center"> is not important for validation page by page). What do you call « preview content » ? for that kind of "edition" it should be special level "pseudovalidate" - > best in pink. > I think you confusing validation and tool for validation. All edition tools are equal, either by the usual interface, by a customed interface, by VisualEditor (one day...), by AWB, by API, or by a BGB. The tool is mostly irrelevant, what matters is what is changed (or not). Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
