2015-08-11 13:59 GMT+01:00 Nicolas VIGNERON <vigneron.nicolas at gmail.com>: > You're mixing a little bit « validation » and « perfection ». For > example, if a page contains « word » or « wоrd » instead of « word > », it's not perfect but it's valid as it invisible for 90% of > readers and tools (plus, there is other tools to detect this specific errors).
maybe... but, there's another concern about the BGB (mentioned by Ankry), the mental problem of new users - when they "validate" in edit mode or Visual Editor and notice a typo (or absence of comma) it is just a click to improve the text, but. .. in view mode, after noticing the error, you have to do IT all (which is such a inconvenience causing BGB proposal): enter to the edit mode, find again the same place in the text, place the cursor ... I'm afraid of thinking like: "Uh ... it's just one comma, I click right away in the BGB... Z. _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
