I see an argument unsupported by evidence, and without evidence it approaches baseless and without value.
Please go and write an essay about the matter at https://wikisource.org/ referencing the original argument for the split, and how the reintroduction of a single site would be of value, and how it might be done. In fact how it will be better than now. Otherwise all I see is a doom and gloom worry-wort. Regards, Billinghurst On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Alex Brollo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm deeply convinced that splitting wikisource projects into variuos > languages has been a mistake. > > Is anyone so bold to imagine that it is possible to revert that mistake? > > Or, are we forced to travel along the diabolicum trail? > > Alex > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > _______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
