Thanks for interest. I work mainly into it.source, but I often try to work a little bit into other projects too for a number of reasons. I find unknown templates, tools, policies, all from them very interesting; and I do too some effort to import them into it.source, but it's difficult, since diversity grows daily and some good ideas are very difficult to implement into different contexts.
I'm only a wikisource active user, not more than this, I've not sufficient technical or organizing skills to build a project to revert what I see as a big mistake, and I'm far from sure that my opinion is right; but I feel the need to share this personal opinion. About mul.source: my suggestion would be, to activate into it best tools and gadgets, best templates, best policies and best docs; to remove as soon as possible any trouble for its users; and to encourage users to upload there any multi-language book. Alex 2015-11-28 12:54 GMT+01:00 Bodhisattwa Mandal <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I failed to understand how splitting Wikisource projects in different > languages had been a mistake and how that affected communities badly. > > As part of Bengali Wikisource community, I can only say, we are doing well > and we don't want to return back to old multilingual Wikisource. > > Regards, > Bodhisattwa > On 28 Nov 2015 16:10, "billinghurst" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I see an argument unsupported by evidence, and without evidence it >> approaches baseless and without value. >> >> Please go and write an essay about the matter at >> https://wikisource.org/ referencing the original argument for the >> split, and how the reintroduction of a single site would be of value, >> and how it might be done. In fact how it will be better than now. >> Otherwise all I see is a doom and gloom worry-wort. >> >> Regards, Billinghurst >> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Alex Brollo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I'm deeply convinced that splitting wikisource projects into variuos >> > languages has been a mistake. >> > >> > Is anyone so bold to imagine that it is possible to revert that mistake? >> > >> > Or, are we forced to travel along the diabolicum trail? >> > >> > Alex >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wikisource-l mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
