Hello Andrea, I don't believe that the integration state have move forward since Wikisource conference. The current state is something like: - if a work had many edition, have an item for the work and one for each edition, link the Wikisource disambiguation page to the work item and the main page of each edition (in ns0) to the edtion items. Do nothing for the index: page. - if a work had only one edition, have a single item for both and link to the main Page: of ns0 in Wikisource.
I would also be very happy to hear about if things moved in other communities. Thomas > Le 21 mai 2016 à 10:48, Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > next week I'll participate in a conference/hackathon called WikiCite [1] > > It will be a great opportunity to talk about Wikidata and books in general, > and of course I'd love to work about the integration of Wikidata and > Wikisource. > > It is my understanding (but please correct me if I'm wrong) that very few > Wikisource integrated their books with Wikidata. > > Of course, this is because the perennial issue of complicated relationships > between books: a book as a "work", a book as an "edition" of that work. > To complicate further, Wikisources host the ns0 textual version of a book and > the nsIndex, but Wikidata do want only one sitelink... > > Many discussions happened here [2], > but I fear I'm lost now. I don't know where are we now, and if some community > did indeed solve the problem. > If your so, please tell :-) > > It's really important. > > Aubrey > > > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiCite_2016 > [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Wikisource > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
