Thanks Tpt for the quick response. I feel that that is the situation for most Wikisources: the problem is that it's a static model, and not a procedure. For example: I put a new book in my Wikisource, what should I do? * check if is a new edition of a book in WS if not * check if there is already an item on WD ** if so, check if is work or edition ** if edition --> ok, link it ** if work, create edition, then link it
Workflows like this, I think, are not in place. We would need a WikidataWizard :-D Aubrey On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Thomas Tanon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Andrea, > > I don't believe that the integration state have move forward since > Wikisource conference. The current state is something like: > - if a work had many edition, have an item for the work and one for each > edition, link the Wikisource disambiguation page to the work item and the > main page of each edition (in ns0) to the edtion items. Do nothing for the > index: page. > - if a work had only one edition, have a single item for both and link to > the main Page: of ns0 in Wikisource. > > I would also be very happy to hear about if things moved in other > communities. > > Thomas > > > Le 21 mai 2016 à 10:48, Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > > > Hi everyone, > > next week I'll participate in a conference/hackathon called WikiCite [1] > > > > It will be a great opportunity to talk about Wikidata and books in > general, and of course I'd love to work about the integration of Wikidata > and Wikisource. > > > > It is my understanding (but please correct me if I'm wrong) that very > few Wikisource integrated their books with Wikidata. > > > > Of course, this is because the perennial issue of complicated > relationships between books: a book as a "work", a book as an "edition" of > that work. > > To complicate further, Wikisources host the ns0 textual version of a > book and > > the nsIndex, but Wikidata do want only one sitelink... > > > > Many discussions happened here [2], > > but I fear I'm lost now. I don't know where are we now, and if some > community did indeed solve the problem. > > If your so, please tell :-) > > > > It's really important. > > > > Aubrey > > > > > > > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiCite_2016 > > [2] https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Wikisource > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikisource-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
