Thanks Mathieu. What really strikes me is that challenge is doable in fr.wikisource: in many others would be complete madness ;-) Also, Polish Wikisource is doing great.
What interest me is understanding how they are building their community of active and super-active proofreaders: are they doing something that other wikisource aren't? Aubrey On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:36 AM, mathieu stumpf guntz < [email protected]> wrote: > I guess that the "100 livres en 100 jours > <https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Accueil/100wikijours>" (100 > books in 100 days) challenge help somewhat. The goal is to treat a whole > new book everyday. No anticipation work allowed. Missing the goal a single > day reset the counter. > > Le 03/11/2016 à 01:46, Sam Wilson a écrit : > > Yes, I agree! :-) There're so many smallish things that I reckon can go a > long way towards making Wikisources bigger and better. > > And it keeps surprising me how many people within the Wikimedia movement > aren't familiar with how Wikisource works — and are amazed when they're > shown! :-) It really does seem that we're not very good at advertising > ourselves. (Well, one doesn't like to blow one's own trumpet, does one?) > > Talking of stats, what is French Wikisource doing that's so successful at > getting things proofread and validated? > https://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/graphs/Wikisource_-_ > proofread_pages_per_day.png > https://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php?diff=30 > > —sam > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016, at 02:16 AM, Andrea Zanni wrote: > > Thanks, Jayanta, > is very important that you keep track of this progress. > Have you talked with Sam Wilson about this? > There could be many ways in which the WMF can help you > analyze this important moment of the Indic community, > and it's also very important to them (and their donors) > to understand how do they have an impact. > Google OCR is a "simple thing", but we ("Western wikisources) learned very > late that > OCR was not available in many Indic languages. > I have shown many people in the WMF the stats about Telugu Wikisource (the > peak in the chart) > and it's crucial that many other people inside WMF is aware of that. > The Indic Wikisource community can show that there are very "cheap" things > the WMF can do to help their communities thrive. The Indic Wikisource > community thus has a big responsability ;-) > Aubrey > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jayanta Nath <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > We've just published the November 2016 Indic Wikisource statistics. After > implementing Google OCR script to our all Indic Wikisource , they are > growing rapidly. > > Here is the few stats ans their top three rank... > As per Number of article > 1. Sanskrit Wikisource ( 15445 pages) - supported by 0.05% scan pages. > 2. Telugu Wikisource ( 11707 pages) - supported by 24.3% scan pages. > 3. Kannada Wikisource ( 7864 pages) - supported by 0.99% scan pages. > > > As per Number of page Validation > > 1. Telugu Wikisource ( 18142 pages) > 2. Tamil Wikisource ( 5167 pages) > 3. Gujarati Wikisource ( 3729 pages) > > > As per Number of page Proofread > > 1. Telugu Wikisource ( 20213 pages) > 2. Malayalam Wikisource ( 8065 pages) > 3. Tamil Wikisource ( 7737 pages) > > As per percentage supported by scan pages. > 1. Bengali Wikisource (25.90%) > 2. Telugu Wikisource ( 24.30%) > 3. Gujarati Wikisource (17.51%) > I want to specially mention that there are no visible improvement at > Marathi and Assamese Wikisource. > > For Sanskrit and Kannada Wikisource, they need to exploring their work of > proofreaded text towards scan page support. > Full Indic Wikisource stats here > https://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Indic_Wikisource_Stats > Regards, > Jayanta Nath > Indic Wikisource Community > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > *_______________________________________________* > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing > [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
