I go sometimes into fr.source as a contributor, even if my French is very poor; I appreciate a lot fr.source editing tools for proofreading, they document a deep interest about any trick to make editing faster, safer, and more comfortable. This "evidence of care" is very rewarding for any contributor.
Alex 2016-11-03 12:46 GMT+01:00 Ankry <[email protected]>: > > 2016-11-03 10:12 GMT+01:00 Andrea Zanni <[email protected]>: > > > >> Thanks Mathieu. > >> What really strikes me is that challenge is doable in fr.wikisource: in > >> many others would be complete madness ;-) > >> Also, Polish Wikisource is doing great. > >> > >> What interest me is understanding how they are building their community > >> of > >> active and super-active proofreaders: are they doing something that > >> other > >> wikisource aren't? > >> > > > > Not sure if there is a link but when you mention fr.ws and pl.ws I can > > immediately think of a correlation since these two are among the rare > > wikisources which are prooferead system only (or nearly only : 92 % and > 96 > > % of mainspace pages back with scan, see > > http://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php). > > > > Cdlt, ~nicolas > > In pl.ws we have a policy that if a text *can* be processed using > ProofreadPage (legal aspects, scan availability) then it *has to* be > processed using this extention. > > Ankry > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
