Amir, Coming from a community with not much volunteer force, I actually want any strategy which involves minimal human interference into the tagging process, as we can't afford to spread our thin line.
Your first option looks more inclined to what I was trying to say. However, I understand that there will be possibilities of errors or ambiguities and need some level of human check system anyway. Personally, I would love the third option but looks like it requires more engineering than the other two, forgive me if I am wrong. So considering the lack of initiatives in this area in the past, I would stick to the first one as a more practical approach for now. Regards, Bodhisattwa On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 02:18 Amir E. Aharoni <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: > Do you mean that templates (or some other annotation syntax) will be added > to wikitext, just not by humans? > > Or suggested by software, and added to wikitext after being confirmed by > humans? > > Or not added to wikitext at all and stored separately somewhere? > > בתאריך יום ג׳, 28 ביולי 2020, 18:36, מאת Bodhisattwa Mandal < > bodhisattwa.rg...@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to know if any Wikisource community has moved forward to >> *automatically[1]* tag or annotate Wikisource texts or has any plans to >> do so. >> >> Regards, >> Bodhisattwa >> >> [1] (without manually adding annotation templates) >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikisource-l mailing list >> Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikisource-l mailing list > Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
