That would be great. I second this notion whole heartedly.
On Jan 28, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Russell Blau wrote: > "Brion Vibber" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> On 1/27/09 2:55 PM, Robert Rohde wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Brion Vibber<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On 1/27/09 2:35 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: >>>>> The way I see it, what we need is to get a really powerful server >>>> Nope, it's a software architecture issue. We'll restart it with >>>> the new >>>> arch when it's ready to go. >>> The simplest solution is just to kill the current dump job if you >>> have >>> faith that a new architecture can be put in place in less than a >>> year. >> >> We'll probably do that. >> >> -- brion > > FWIW, I'll add my vote for aborting the current dump *now* if we don't > expect it ever to actually be finished, so we can at least get a > fresh dump > of the current pages. > > Russ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
