On 1/27/09 2:55 PM, Robert Rohde wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Brion Vibber<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 1/27/09 2:35 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: >>> The way I see it, what we need is to get a really powerful server >> Nope, it's a software architecture issue. We'll restart it with the new >> arch when it's ready to go. > > I don't know what your timetable is, but what about doing something to > address the other aspects of the dump (logs, stubs, etc.) that are in > limbo while full history chugs along. All the other enwiki files are > now 3 months old and that is already enough to inconvenience some > people. > > The simplest solution is just to kill the current dump job if you have > faith that a new architecture can be put in place in less than a year.
We'll probably do that. -- brion _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
