Domas Mituzas wrote: > even if it could be possible to reduce amount of pointers in text by > reusing them (one can point same text entry to multiple revisions, as > it was already noted), it could make maintenance/batch operations much > more complicated.
It's already this way, as rollback reuses (reused?) the pointers, so making other cases also reuse the text entry doesn't add any complexity. > Anyway, there's a bit more visual expression of our data sizes within > core databases: > http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pfjIQrTbpVkaIStok1hWAdg How's that commonswiki is both on s2 and s3? (the one on s2 being 10 times larger) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
