"Domas Mituzas" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > > >> You know, wikitech-l is for MediaWiki development discussion as well, >> not just site operations. mediawiki-l is only for MediaWiki support, >> not for all MediaWiki discussion. > > It is for wikimedia's mediawiki development - all our wikis surely > need lots of that. But when it comes to: > "when all you use is MediaWiki, then you're on your own " > I'm not suggesting that you're on your own, I'm suggesting nice people > on mediawiki-l. > > Oh, and those problems, they definitely sound like support questions. > > If you feel there is no arena to "discuss" general mediawiki rather > than "support", we may assist you with communications infrastructure > for that. > > You know, foundation-l should be also used for mediawiki discussion > (oh, sometimes it is), still, mediawiki, wikimedia, what the diff? > >> At least, that's what I've always >> been told, and Meta agrees: >> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/overview > > > It is a wiki! > http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mailing_lists%2Foverview&diff=1453292&oldid=1451346 > ;-)
That doesn't seem right to me, and it completely contradicts my expectations and the reason I've been using this list for the past however many years: My understanding: * mediawiki-l - support * wikitech-l - development That seems like a much clearer and more sensible division than: * mediawiki-l - development * wikitech-l - development but only if it's relevant to Wikimedia You're right - it is a wiki.... which is why I trust the information that's been there since 2006, rather than the information that was added this morning. - Mark Clements (HappyDog) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
