Neil Harris wrote: > > Regarding dashes and hyphens, I've now found my original data set, and > a quick inspection gives this set of various similar-looking Latin > hyphens, dashes and minus signs: > U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS > U+2010 HYPHEN > U+2011 NON-BREAKING HYPHEN > U+2012 FIGURE DASH > U+2013 EN DASH > and at this point I missed out U+2014 EM DASH , which was hiding in the world of transitive closure mentioned below... > U+2212 MINUS SIGN > U+FE58 SMALL EM DASH > U+FF0D FULLWIDTH HYPHEN-MINUS > > I can send the full data set of lookalikes to anyone who is interested: > it can be quite easily extended by regarding the relation "looks like" > as transitive, to include more distant and linguistically dubious visual > confusables such as (just for example) U+2015 HORIZONTAL BAR, U+1173 > HANGUL JUNGSEONG EU and U+2F00 KANGXI RADICAL ONE. > > -- Neil >
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
