Brion Vibber wrote: > Note that its CPU load is consistently pretty low. > I added the graph as an attachment to the bug report instead. That week view really smooths things out. Last night at one point, it took about 5 minutes for anything.... 2 minute saves were common.
> Personally I haven't noticed any unusual performance browsing and > editing through secure.wikimedia.org the last couple weeks versus > behavior on the non-SSL view. > I've not really tried the non-SSL much, except running scripts, which still see a fair number of lag messages. Although nothing like last weekend, with dozens of lag messages on every attempt.... Thank heavens (and its helpers) that's clearing up! But I'd started this thread before that problem cropped up. > If you have all default options, then saving edits to particularly large > or template-complicated pages may indeed be slower through > secure.wikimedia.org than not. If you have changed options which affect > rendering, then it should be about the same either way. (Except for the > inherent extra slowness making the SSL connections.) > Pretty much vanilla options, except setting my date formats to yyyy-mm-dd. I'll try some regular logins, and see whether that's any different. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
