I decided to investigate how well parserTests exercises the MW code. So, I
threw together a couple of MacGyver tools that use xdebug's code coverage
capability and analyzed the results. The results are very, very preliminary,
but I thought I would get them out so others can look them over. In the next
couple of days I hope to post more detailed results and the tools themselves on
the Mediawiki wiki. (If someone could tell me the appropriate page to use that
would be useful. Otherwise, I will just create a page in my own namespace).
The statistics (again very preliminary) are:
Number of files exercised: 141 Number of lines in those files: 85606
Lines covered: 59489 Lines not covered: 26117 Percentage covered:
0.694916244188
So, parserTests is getting (at best) about 70% code coverage. This is better
than I expected, but still it means parserTests does not test 26117 lines of
code. What I mean by "at best" is xdebug just notes whether a line of code is
visited. It doesn't do any logic analysis on which branches are taken.
Furthermore, parserTests may not visit some files that are critical to the
operation of the MW software. Obviously, xdebug can only gather statistics on
visited files.
I want to emphasize that there may be errors in these results due to bad
assumptions on my part or bad coding. However, it is a place to start.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
