On 30/07/2009, at 3:53 PM, dan nessett wrote: > > True. However, knowing the coverage of parserTests and knowing which > code isn't even being visited by it is the first step in > understanding where the holes are in testing. Code coverage is a > primitive metric. But, it's a place to start.
The parser test is a test of the parser. The parser tests do not, have not, and will not cover anything other than the parser. Measuring code coverage as a percentage of *core* is a really bad idea. Try checking the percentage of includes/parser/ covered. -- Andrew Garrett [email protected] http://werdn.us/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
