Bryan Tong Minh wrote: > We could take a look at Bazaar. It has pretty good SVN integration.You > can create a (centralized) checkout of an SVN repo and when you commit > into that centralized checkout from your local Bazaar branch it should > commit into the master SVN as well (as I understand it). This would > allow peaceful concurrent use of a centralized and decentralized > version control system (although Bazaar itself supports centralized > use as well). Plus it works natively on Windows without icky POSIX > emulation layers. > > I have not had time myself to look into the details yet, so I don't > know if what I wrote actually works, but it looks promising from what > I read. > > Bryan
I didn't try bazaar too much, but my experience is that it works. Although I sympathise with Chad. With several SCMs out there you end up having to use (and their commands are slightly different between them :( ...). > As far as i know, the current trend is more towards Git than towards > Bazaar. It's not a bad system, but Git seems to have more traction at > the moment. > > -- Hay git seems to be bad at integrating with Windows. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
