> It would be good if all testing frameworks were fairly consistent. I believe
> a project is going to be set up to coordinate this.

That's good, as the parser tests are the most widespread, copying that
configuration seems easiest. (Notwithstanding all the other advantages
mentioned previously).

> 
> As Roan mentioned, we are primarily setting up a selenium grid architecture
> up for doing testing for usability initiative. The long term goal for this
> is to integrate with code review, and to have a general selenium test suite
> for MediaWiki. We are in the initial stages for planning how selenium will
> fit in with the MediaWiki development process, and we welcome all input. If
> you, or anyone, want to be included in the planning process, let us know.

Yes, I am interested - this mailing list or a
http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Selenium would be the most findable.

> http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/Resources#Interaction_testing_automation
> 
> http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Selenium_architecture_diagram.svg

Thanks for the links.

Conrad

> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to