Yes, I'll definitly keep that in mind. Currently I'm thinking that for
deleted images and old versions of images I'll keep all the metadata
inside img_metadata as serialized php, since most of the use cases for
having metadata in a different table really only apply to the current
version of images.

Cheers,
bawolff



On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Ilmari Karonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> bawolff wrote:
>>
>> However, if I do implement a new table as part of this, it will
>> probably use page_ids to identify the image - I don't see any reason
>> to artificially restrict it to just the file namespace.
>
> Do remember that we'll also want to store metadata for old versions of
> images.  And yes, I'm aware that our database schema isn't likely to lend
> itself to easy and elegant solutions to that.  (My advice: try to go for
> simplicity at the expense of elegance, as long as it doesn't end up _too_
> ugly.)
>
> --
> Ilmari Karonen
>

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to