On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Consider the following edit sequence: > > A, B, C, D, E > > A is a previously approved version. B, and D are all excellent edits. > C and E are obvious vandalism. E even managed to undo all the good > changes of B,D while adding the vandalism.
The only way to handle this sort of thing is to actually look at the intermediate edits. I don't know if there is a nice way to simplify that workflow, but it points me towards the idea that reviewing should be done off the history page, not directly off a list of "unreviewed pages". - Carl _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
