On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Carl (CBM) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> Consider the following edit sequence: >> >> A, B, C, D, E >> >> A is a previously approved version. B, and D are all excellent edits. >> C and E are obvious vandalism. E even managed to undo all the good >> changes of B,D while adding the vandalism. > > The only way to handle this sort of thing is to actually look at the > intermediate edits. I don't know if there is a nice way to simplify > that workflow, but it points me towards the idea that reviewing should > be done off the history page, not directly off a list of "unreviewed > pages".
This is how the software worked until recently. :( I feel foolish for not catching this until now even though I was aware of the addition of the reject button. Sorry. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
