Marco Schuster wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Platonides <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Other patches are not so fine...
>>        wfSuppressWarnings();
>> -       session_start();
>> +       @session_start();
>>        wfRestoreWarnings();
>>
>>
>> Sure, it was for FusionForge package, but still what error would
>> session_start produce that is not trapped? (I can only make an E_NOTICE
>> or E_WARNING...)
> It's enough to break later header(); with "Can't send header
> information - headers already sent by in foo".
> 
> Marco

The point is, both of them are suppressed by wfSuppressWarnings...
So what can the @ be suppressed that wfSuppressWarnings may have missed?

Unless the decision to add an @ there predates out own warning supppresion.


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to