On 10/12/10 7:42 PM, MZMcBride wrote: > Trevor Parscal wrote: >> Apologies in advance for the sheer triviality of this matter; >> unfortunately these kinds of bike shed problems [2] tend to be >> infinitely exciting, while complex matters are more often met with >> general disinterest. >> >> [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/73030#c10054 >> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_Law_of_Triviality > Naming and naming conventions aren't trivialities. > Show me the convention for naming extensions and I will follow it. As long as there is none, spending time going back and forth discussing the name of something that users will never see is indeed spending time on a trivial matter. > The issue here is not a color of the bike shed problem. The issue is that > almost everyone who has commented is in favor of getting rid of the bike > shed and putting the bikes in the garage. The opposition to putting this > extension (these extensions) in core seems to be largely focused on a lack > of written process for when and when not to merge extensions into core. > That's an entirely different discussion, and the results of that discussion have so far been that any such action is being deferred until after 1.17. > MZMcBride > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
