On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> wrote: > I am explicitly requesting discussion about it so that I can take action > based on the desire of the community. What cop-out are you referring to? >
That would be this one: > Show me the convention for naming extensions and I will follow it. As > long as there is none, spending time going back and forth discussing the > name of something that users will never see is indeed spending time on a > trivial matter. This is coming across as "no policy on naming, therefore naming does not really matter." > The only response I've gotten so far is "merge into core", which is an > interesting response, but does not resolve the issue at hand, which is, > until we do so (assuming we do at some point after 1.17), what should > this extension be named? > Why does it have to wait until after 1.17, again? > I'm not defending the current name any more than stating it's my > preference. I'm not only open to naming it something else, but I'm > asking for input on what to name it. > If it *has* to be its own extension and not a part of core of the main UsabilityInitiative, my vote would be for something like "VectorAddons" or similar. -Chad _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
