On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar <[email protected]> wrote: > If I've understood you correctly, your suggestion is that, to make > logging easier, we should adopt a convention of how we call certain web > resources.
I'm not so much suggesting it as I am stating the status quo, and asking whether we should document it well or change the code. > I can't imagine that you will ever be able to get all the programmers to > agree not to use URLs that way. It's not like we can mark the URL as > being dangerous somehow. As long as the URL works, they'll want to use > it... and really, why shouldn't they? And they did. See https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25564 On 10/19/10 1:29 PM, Roan Kattouw wrote: > Never before did we load JS through a special page like that, and with > the resource loader coming up it will never be needed ever again, > cause we can and will run everything through load.php . It's a > one-time anomaly, so no need for any convention. I guess I'm not quite so confident this problem won't rear it's head again, but since it's a theoretical problem at this point, and we have enough actual problems to deal with, I'm happy to drop it for now. Rob _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
