Rob Lanphier wrote:
> I guess I'm not quite so confident this problem won't rear it's head
> again, but since it's a theoretical problem at this point, and we have
> enough actual problems to deal with, I'm happy to drop it for now.

This thread reminded me of the old Webalizer hack of including
"&dontcountme=s" in URLs to avoid things like JavaScript loads inflating the
stats it collected. (Or at least I think that's the issue the URL parameter
was trying to solve.)

The URL trick crept into all sorts of places, including site-wide JavaScript
pages, article text, and even core code.[1]

I think setting a standard is a good idea in general, though I worry about
making it prefix-based (like all URLs starting with
"http://foo.wikiproject.org/wiki/";). I can see potential problems with
counting hits to the secure server and I can see potential problems if the
URL structure changes in the future (possibly to something more sensible
like "http://foo.wikiproject.org/view/";). These problems might be
non-existent or unavoidable, I'm not completely sure.

MZMcBride

[1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/35103



_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to