Bryan Tong Minh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> wrote:
>> "An alternative [to rejecting all ZIP files] would be to parse the
>> entire zip directory and to reject any archives that contain a file
>> with a .class extension. I can’t vouch for this method. **If you did
>> this, the zip library you used would have to be exactly as tolerant of
>> zip format errors as the one used by Java.** It would probably be best
>> to actually shell out to Java to do the test."
>>
> 
> I was thinking about this. There appears to be no option to the java
> command line client to only check a file without executing. An option
> would be to invoke the java debugger (jdb), which initially breaks at
> the first instruction and presumably fails if the file is not a valid
> jar. Still sounds nasty though, plus the fact that jdb is not a
> generally installed program.
> 
> 
> Bryan

Note that you can't simply check (or reverse-engineer) that JVM X
doesn't treat it as a jar, since it could be detected in X-1 or X+1.
So there should be a range of still in use JVMs to assert.


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to