On 05/12/10 11:25, Roan Kattouw wrote:
> 2010/12/5 Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]>:
>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Victor Vasiliev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I do not like the idea of releasing code that was not run on Wikimedia
>>> wikis for at least a week. That may result in a rather buggy 1.17.
>>
>> Also agree, as I've said elsewhere.  Better to delay branching 1.17 an
>> extra month or two than to release it when it hasn't been tested on
>> Wikimedia sites.
>>
> Possibly superfluous clarification: what we're talking about here is
> to branch 1.17wmf1 (i.e. WMF deployment), not an immediate 1.17
> release candidate. Obviously we'd deploy first and release later,
> that's what we've always done AFAIK.

Presumably you mean that we would create REL1_17 now, as a copy from
trunk, then run make-wmf-branch in January, which would copy from
REL1_17 to 1.17wmf1, to be deployed shortly after. Then we would tag
for release of 1.17 beta 1 some time after that.

I am fine with this plan.

-- Tim Starling


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to