Niklas Laxström wrote: > Besides, it feels silly to talk about this, while we simultaneously > talk about including some of the most common extensions in the name of > providing feature complete MediaWiki straight from the box--which is a > goal I agree with.
I wouldn't say it's silly. If a very large percentage of MediaWiki installations will end up installing ParserFunctions, but a very small percentage of MediaWiki installations will end up using an obscure message file, there's a reasonable debate there about which to include. A somewhat similar metric is sometimes used when determining whether a feature should go into core or into an extension. Speaking of extensions, there's now a bug about bundling ParserFunctions with MediaWiki: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26261 Tim has asked developers who support (or oppose, I guess) this idea to comment on that bug. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
