"In dotCommunist Ew Ork, Aris, and Ome, Wikipedia disrupts you!" Suggestion: Set the sights a little higher, and I'd say start by ditching the "disruption" metaphor, which is fine and good for firms, but less sensible in a landscape that's already massively and "organically" distributed (I'm thinking of the free culture movement as a whole). If the rhetorical question is "how to build a better encyclopedia?" or "how to further the WMF's mission?" -- here's something: how about some specific and well-thought out proposals and a way to discuss them that doesn't devolve to some sort of punditry pissing contest? Like, a UserVoice-style feedback system (instead of this: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Bugzilla#Requesting_a_feature) and clear way to keep track of project and subproject progress (Redmine?), including a way to make sense of the priorities and other trends that govern progress on the current set of open bugs (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=status%3Aopen).
In real simple terms, know thyself! _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
