2011/1/4 Platonides <[email protected]> > > Do not try to be over-paranoid on not using the fetaures you have > available. You can ask for advice if something you have done is sane or > not, of course. > An interesting point is that labelled section transclusion is enabled on > French wikipedia. It's strange that someone got tricked into enabling it > on that 'big' project. I wonder how is it being used there. >
French wikisource is hardly working to convert "naked texts" into "texts with scans", this means that theu user very largely #lst. Their work is excellent. There are many contributors. I guess, that many of them work too into pedia. Perhaps they import there their useful tool. See http://toolserver.org/~thomasv/graphs/Wikisource_-_texts_fr.png to see how hard they use proofreading. Perhaps #lst is inefficient.... but I'd like to compare #lst and template efficiency. Sometimes I see complex, very complex templates used for so banal aims.... ;-) Alex _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
