Hey, Although the tag name issue is a valid point, it has nothing to do with my original email. So please start a separate discussion rather then hijacking this thread.
Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw http://blog.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. -- On 13 January 2011 03:19, Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> wrote: > <tag name>...</tag name> > Definitely sounds like something we shouldn't support. That kind of > thing just screams "you're at the mercy of whatever developer in the > future decides to change the parser to 'actually' parse out xml tags > with more xml or html-like parsing, instead of simply doing a search and > replace based on a list of tag names". > Not to mention it's confusing and counterintuitive in articles > themselves. What if the <display> tag actually supported a map argument? > <display map foo> gets treated as a <display map> tag, but <display foo > map> gets properly treated as a <display> tag? bleeeeech... And I have > to feel sorry for the users that actually understand any small level of > xml or html that are looking at <display map> in a random page and > reading that as a tag with the tagName 'display'. > > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
