Trevor Parscal wrote: > There are 2 components to the JavaScriptDistiller library. One of them (the > ParseMaster class) is 100% in sync with the official distribution. The other > (the JavaScriptDistiller class) was originally based on the > JavaScriptPacker::_basicCompression function. That function had some issues > that we have worked out, and in the process of doing that we've gotten really > far away from the original source. It appears that our version is just about > stable, so I plan to offer the code in JavaScriptDistiller to the > JavaScriptPacker author to try and help make his library better as well. > > In the former case, any changes should be strictly passed upstream. In the > latter case, I think we should offer them upstream but realize that we have > deviated from the original author's structure and possibly intentions enough > that they may or may not be wanted. > > - Trevor
How should they be sent upstream? I did for instance a small change at r81207, but given that we don't have any tests, decided to wait before annoying the upstream author (I think that would be Nicolas?). I don't see a repository there, so we could as well offer him space for it in our hierarchy. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
