MZMcBride wrote: > Guillaume Paumier wrote: >> The installation of ResourceLoader may cause compatibility issues >> with >> existing JavaScript code. > > It'd be nice to have a list of things that will definitely be > problematic > (must be fixed), things that might be problematic (should be fixed), > and > things that are generally discouraged (can be fixed). > > For example, Meta-Wiki was returning completely blank pages due to > the use > of document.write() on pages that contained a particular CSS class. If > document.write() is completely disallowed, it should be noted > somewhere > prominently along with other problematic or possibly problematic > bits of > code. I briefly checked http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader > but > didn't see this kind of list off-hand.
> I wrote http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader/Coding_changes > as a > stub, though shortly after doing so, I discovered > http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader/Documentation/Migration_guide > which was commented out from the list of documentation pages. It may > or may > not make sense to merge these pages (it's still a little unclear to > me who > the migration guide is intended for). > > MZMcBride I've moved the page to: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader/Migration_guide_(users) And the other one to: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader/Migration_guide_(developers) The other page is/will be more oriented on the backend (ie. what Extensions developers should change, how to load the files, where to define the modules, etc.) Which, in turn, reminds me of: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ResourceLoader/Documentation/Using_with_extensions Which should probably be merged into Migration_guide_(developers). -- Krinkle _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
