On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Lewis Cawte wrote: > [...] > > I do agree that some of those gadgets should not be > > extensions, however for example, Twinkle, would be a very nice > > extension, as noted from various blips of activity from site owners > > over IRC. > > Maybe, but when done as an extension imho it should be integrated in > MediaWiki > with it's own preference page, adding the actions as actual actions > and interface > messages etc. Not as an extension that loads a few javascript files. > These shouldn't really be thought of as separate issues; there's no reason we can't extend the Gadget interface to allow gadgets to define their own preference panels cleanly, and I'm pretty sure that would be a win for users. > Including for example non-JavaScript fallback (not as a goal but as a > result of it being integrated). > Non-JS of course is the main thing that's hard to do in JavaScript. ;) -- brion _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
