Chad wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ryan Lane <rlan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm not sure we have standards on hook names (someone please correct >> me, if this isn't the case). >> > > In core, there certainly is no naming convention for hooks. Some are verb > phrases, some are noun phrases. I think if you're adding a hook to an > extension you should prefix it with something unlikely to conflict with a > core hook (now or in the future). > > I believe some extensions do something like "ExtensionName::HookName" > but I don't think this is widely enforced. > > -Chad
Given that these are generic hook names, I think it is fine with the current names and they should get that wiki pages documentation (with the proper note that the action is currently only done by UserMerge). Note that the hook parameters (which I haven't reviewed) should be general enough for the target action (ie. not specific to UserMerge). _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
