Am 30.05.2011 01:05, schrieb Platonides: > Chad wrote: >> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Ryan Lane <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm not sure we have standards on hook names (someone please correct >>> me, if this isn't the case). >>> >> In core, there certainly is no naming convention for hooks. Some are verb >> phrases, some are noun phrases. I think if you're adding a hook to an >> extension you should prefix it with something unlikely to conflict with a >> core hook (now or in the future). >> >> I believe some extensions do something like "ExtensionName::HookName" >> but I don't think this is widely enforced. >> >> -Chad > Given that these are generic hook names, I think it is fine with the > current names and they should get that wiki pages documentation (with > the proper note that the action is currently only done by UserMerge). > > Note that the hook parameters (which I haven't reviewed) should be > general enough for the target action (ie. not specific to UserMerge). >
I just found this is a good place to add my new two hooks (soon later) --> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_hook_registry Tom _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
