----- Original Message -----

> From: Sumurai8 (DD) <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: 
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 11:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Mediawiki and a standard template library
> 
>>  On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Max Semenik <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>>  On 20.08.2011, 22:23 Martijn wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  On wikimedia projects that are not Wikipedia (Wikia in specific 
> comes
>>>>  to mind) I often find myself using templates that have not been
>>>>  defined on that installation. The English Wikipedia (which I am 
> most
>>>>  familiar with) has many very usefull templates, especially the
>>>>  {{citeFoo}} templates, but numerous others as well. Trying to 
> 'import'
>>>>  one is a bit of a pain though. Many templates depend on other
>>>>  templates, and it is not often very clear how (as a fun exercise 
> for
>>>>  the reader, try to import the {{convert}} template to a new wiki, 
> and
>>>>  see how easy it is!). I was wondering if it might be a good idea to
>>>>  include a standard template library to Wikimedia installations,
>>>>  containing a set of utility templates along with the Wikimedia
>>>>  distribution. I'm cross-posting foudation, for possible 
> discussion if
>>>>  this is desirable, and wikitech, for possible discussion if this is
>>>>  feasable.
>>> 
>>>  Don't forget, English is one of 300-something languages we support.
>>>  And users of other languages typically don't feel comfortable with
>>>  using English templates, because words like "cite book", 
> "author" and
>>>  "link" are meaningless to them. So we're speaking about 
> 300+ sets of
>>>  templates. This is both unmaintainable and burdensome. And don't
>>>  forget, not every MediaWiki (that's how our software is called, not
>>>  Wikimedia!) will want them. I would suppport a system that downloads
>>>  them on-demand, however shipping zillion templates out of the box is
>>>  simply out of the question.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  --
>>>  Best regards,
>>>  ?Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])
>>> 
>> 
>>  eh, Derp on the MediaWiki/Wikimedia, dunno where that came from. Also
>>  I'm not proposing to export all the en.wiki templates, but rather
>>  establish a core set of templates that could be exported (and
>>  translated!) on demand.
>> 
>> 
>>  Regards,
>> 
>>  Martijn
> 
> The English Wikipedia has useful templates for an encyclopedia.
> MediaWiki-software is useful for making an encyclopedia, but doesn't
> have to be forced to be one. If someone wants a template from en.wp,
> they will export it and import it at their own MediaWiki-install. If
> that takes two hours, it says more about the total mess of the en.wp
> template structure, then about the 'lack of standard templates' in a
> MediaWiki-install. It will still take a considerable amount of time to
> import a template with standard templates in place.
> 
> Then there will be a discussion what will be useful templates for a
> new MediaWiki install. If you decide to ship a MediaWiki install with
> a set of templates, the best case is that they will use all templates.
> Every worse case is that they will end up with a few templates they
> can use/want to use and lots and lots of junk.
> 
> Furthermore I am wondering who wants to maintain such an arbitrary
> bunch of templates for 200 languages? It's not only the name of the
> templates that need to be translated. The contents of every template,
> including transclusions of other templates and language-specific
> outcome of 'magic words' (for example in {{#ifeq: }}-statements) need
> to be translated. If one wants to import a template from en.wp, he/she
> has to import templates and templates where that template is depending
> on like before. Now they have to translate the inclusion of standard
> templates too, because on their wiki these standard templates now have
> names in their custom language.
> 
> Sumurai8

So, if I can express some simple opinion, perhaps what would be useful is a 
mean to easily export/import a template and all those which are necessary for 
it to work properly.
I don't know if such a tool exist, but could it bea (partial) solution?

G. Moko
(Forgive my poor english...)

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to