The *syntax* is simple. You can eliminate "unnecessary" primitives. ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of John Du Hart [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 12:12 PM To: Wikimedia developers Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Taking suggestions for a template language syntax for our skin system
It's over complicated for our needs, and we really don't need another full featured language to learn and parse. It's like saying everyone should learn ruby so we can do skins in it. On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Russell N. Nelson - rnnelson < [email protected]> wrote: > Geez, I didn't mean to squash the discussion! TRAC isn't *that* weird a > language, is it? > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [ > [email protected]] on behalf of Russell N. Nelson - > rnnelson [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 2:18 PM > To: Wikimedia developers > Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] Taking suggestions for a template language syntax > for our skin system > > How about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRAC_%28programming_language%29 ? > > It has the benefit that simple things are simple, but you can create > complicated things because it's a full programming language. > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > -- John _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
