When en.wn switched to LQT, we started to get a decent amount more comments per article. Not that all the comments we got were necessarily "good", but it did show that more people had been wanting to comment than were doing so with the old system (IE regular wiki pages).
-Jon On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:49, Max Semenik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Niklas Laxström > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On 12 October 2011 07:35, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Personally I love LQT. I positively hate the old talk system; it is so > > > messy! > > > > And I have love-hate relationship with it. We (translatewiki.net) too > > have long ago stopped filing bug reports against LQT, because they > > just don't get any attention. We have been waiting for the rewrite to > > finish for so long I can't remember anymore, at least six months. We > > somehow manage to live with the issues, but it is not fun by any > > means. I'm not surprised that someone else gave up. > > > > Last time I checked, work on LQT was postponed in favor of MoodBar. With > all > due respect to new trends of editor retention, isn't the old discussion > system one of main things that scares noobs off? > > -- > Best regards, > Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > -- Jon [[User:ShakataGaNai]] / KJ6FNQ http://snowulf.com/ http://ipv6wiki.net/ _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
