Daniel Werner wrote:
> I am thinking about creating a very simple parser function #parse doing
> nothing but returning parameter 1 with an "'noparse' => false" option.
> Is there anything like this (or what could be abused for this) already
> or is there any reason why this might be a bad idea?
>
> The reason I want to have something like this is, I want to create a
> template (for template and parser function black-box tests) accepting
> something like {{((}}#somefunction:a{{!}}b{{!}}c{{))}} as parameter
> value, showing {{#somefunction|a|b|c}} as output and at the same time
> calling {{#parse: {{((}}#somefunction:a{{!}}b{{!}}c{{))}} }} so that
> besides the definition also the result can be shown by the template output.
>
> regards,
> Daniel
I think that would make more sense as a tag extension (parse doesn't
look like a good name, what about <wikidemo>?).
@Happy Melon: I think he wants a funtion which shows both parsed
wikitext and the original source.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l