On 30/10/11 16:47, Happy Melon wrote:
>> I think that would make more sense as a tag extension (parse doesn't
>> look like a good name, what about <wikidemo>?).
>>
>> @Happy Melon: I think he wants a funtion which shows both parsed
>> wikitext and the original source.
>>
>>
> He intends to *build* such a structure, certainly; but I read the OP as
> saying he wanted to implement it via a template like {{demonstrate
> template}} [1] but with (just) the backend handled by a new parser
> function. I agree that you'd be better off/would avoid many of the
> problems given above by having a tag extension
> <wikidemo>{{foo|bar|baz=quok}}</wikidemo> that spat out its contents as a
> parameter to a customisable system message that read something like
> ""<code><nowiki>$1</nowiki></code> produces: $1"". If I remember the parse
> order of tag extensions verses parser function extensions right, that
> should work pretty much straight out of the box??
>
> --HM
A tag hook spits out html, so he would output the content as literal,
then recurse and output it again parsed.
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
