On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Sumana Harihareswara
<[email protected]> wrote:
> If you suspect that a bug has been fixed or is now invalid, then ask
> that question in the bug.
>
> But I agree that "later" really ought not to be a resolution (because
> really a bug marked LATER has not been resolved), but rather a status or
> prioritization.  When I do searches across all the open bugs, I do not
> habitually say "and also ones that are Resolved but only if they've been
> marked Resolved--Later".  And probably most people are making the same
> omission.
>
> Mark H., what do you think?  Also, is there a way to make Bugzilla's
> default search include resolved bugs with the Later resolution?
>

Yes. Went ahead and did this now to include dupes too.

-Chad

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to