Hi, Yes, I have both (jar and even source) but that it's possible to get a source didn't really meant to me that someone is managing it, this whole idea was initiated from the discussion with Roan, who is also operating the current bot, it seems to me that there are some areas which could be improved in case you want to keep the current bot. But that' up to you of course, the new bot is already being used in some other channels, like #wikimedia-labs etc. If you want to keep the current bot in #mediawiki that's ok, I just thought that the rest of community could benefit from the new one. Especially thanks to that it's located on labs and it's easier to operate it. Sorry for misunderstandment :)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:12 PM, OQ <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Petr Bena <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't know java, and no one else is actually maintaining the java >> code of current bot. I didn't say that it's bad because it's written >> in java, neither that c# is better, I simply said that it's written in >> java and that no one is working on the code (it's not even in >> repository, anyway I don't think there would be many people interested >> in keeping this version alive). > > It's java, so if you have the jar you have the source. And yes we have > that too. And yes, there's a few of us 'maintaining' it. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
