On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like us to seriously consider having primary reviewers for various code > modules, so things like this get handled asap and don't end up falling > through the cracks -- big changes, and small confusing changes ;) -- should > get pretty consistently treated.
I think this is a grand idea. A few code areas: Parser (3 revs) https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?path=%2Ftrunk%2Fphase3%2Fincludes%2Fparser&title=Special%3ACode%2FMediaWiki%2Fstatus%2Fnew FIlerepo (12 revs) https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?path=%2Ftrunk%2Fphase3%2Fincludes%2Ffilerepo&title=Special%3ACode%2FMediaWiki%2Fstatus%2Fnew API (4 revs) https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?path=%2Ftrunk%2Fphase3%2Fincludes%2Fapi&title=Special%3ACode%2FMediaWiki%2Fstatus%2Fnew Resource Loader (4 revs): https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?path=%2Ftrunk%2Fphase3%2Fincludes%2Fresourceloader&title=Special%3ACode%2FMediaWiki%2Fstatus%2Fnew Someone will need to do some more looking at different ways of slicing things up. So far, I'm not coming up with many easy ways of dividing core with this style of query. Extensions should be a lot easier to divvy up. Anyone got good ideas for how to make this work? Rob _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
