On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Brion Vibber <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like us to seriously consider having primary reviewers for various code > modules, so things like this get handled asap and don't end up falling > through the cracks -- big changes, and small confusing changes ;) -- should > get pretty consistently treated.
Mark and I have started the process of tagging code areas, which you can see reflected on the revision report: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki_roadmap/1.19/Revision_report There are still a lot of revisions that are still untagged, but not nearly as many as there were a day ago. The tag names are mainly based on extensions right now, but there is a small amount of grouping going on. If someone wants to come up with a more sensible tagging structure, by all means go for it. I hope this is a helpful first step. After the holidays, we can get serious about dividing up the work based on tag. Rob _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
