2012/1/3 Erik Moeller <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Strainu <[email protected]> wrote: >> I wouldn't be so fast in leaving only the sitename as sender name - a >> mail from "Wikipedia" would raise my (manual) spam alarms, just like >> emails from the "Federal Bureau of Investigations" or from "[X] Bank". > > Facebook's email messages come from "Facebook". > Twitter's email messages come from "Twitter". > Google Plus email messages come from "Google+".
Flickr's email messages come from "Flickr mail" Linkedin's email messages come from different senders - by far the best solution. (Installed) Wordpress' emails come from different senders AOL's (does anyone remember them?) emails come from different senders. > OpenTable email messages come from "OpenTable". > Netflix email messages come from "Netflix". > Kickstarter email messages come from "Kickstarter". > Quora email messages come from "Quora". I'll have to take your word on that, I don't use those services. :) > > Not every wheel needs to be reinvented. :) > If you're not sure it's round, you're better off building it again or it may crash you car. The point is there really isn't a rule on this matter, it is just a question of preference or marketing. Strainu _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
