On 21.02.2012, 0:35 Gregory wrote:

> I think the debate is more Meta wiki or MediaWiki.org.

> Petr - my understanding is that Huggle can be utilized by non-WMF
> wikis.  As such, I'd recommend (or advocate for) MediaWiki.org to
> house it.  Probably in the main namespace - which (again - as I
> understand it) houses things specific to MediaWiki software that
> isn't documentation (Manual:), extensions (Extension:) or API (API:) related.

> Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I've generally understand the
> division between the two development wikis (not counting the operations wiki) 
> as:

> - MediaWiki.org:  Anything software development related to the
> MediaWiki software itself - including supplementals - so long as it
> is not WMF-exclusive - such as extensions, MW manual, non-app mobile code, 
> etc.

> - Meta's Developer Hub:  Anything software development exclusive to
> WMF projects (but not necessarily project specific) - such as
> toolserver, WMF specific bots (outside pywikipedia), WP mobile apps
> (I imagine a lot of work would be required to make them work for non-WP 
> sites), SUL, etc.


Imho, a separate namespace should be created on mw.org for such
things, called Tool: or something. We already have a lot of absolutely
unrelated stuff in mainspace, would be great to sort them out.


-- 
Best regards,
  Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]])


_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to