On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Chad wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Can we just set it to an empty string and let the numbers and hand-written
>>> comment speak for themselves?
>>>
>>
>> I think this will be more confusing. You need some text for
>> the radio field.
>>
>> In any case these summaries are not meant to replace a
>> comment and I've never implied that they should. You
>> should always take time to explain your review, especially
>> if it's a -1/-2.
>>
>> -Chad
>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> Can we just set it to an empty string and let the numbers and hand-written
>>> comment speak for themselves?
>
> Yes the radio buttons would have the +2/+1/0/-1/-2, just like they
> after submission.
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Chad wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Krinkle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I couldn't agree more. So far all proposal make implications that sometimes
>>> simply aren't appropriate. Either they leave no room for fixing it ("Don't
>>> submit it"), or are too much foccused on fixing something small, but
>>> implying the overal intention is wanted ("Needs improvement") etc. etc.
>>>
>>
>> Perhaps we could go back to the all-encompassing "fixme." If
>> we did that, I'd suggest adjusting the other ones to one-word
>> summaries as well.
>>
>> -Chad
>
>
> I'm not sure "fixme" is entire appropiate either :D
>
> A gerrit review rejection (which is what a down vote suggests if it is
> unfixable or not fixed) effectively covers both "fixme" and "reverted"
> (when compared to how we review SVN).
>

If something is unfixable, not fixed, or flat out not acceptable,
then that's what Abandon is for.

> "fixme" is no different than "Needs improvement" (except stronger, maybe).
>

Perhaps, but it does help blur the line between "this is broken" and
"this needs improvement."

-Chad

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to